Elon Musk’s efforts to buy Twitter are being closely watched by advertisers.
Ad executives are concerned that the entrepreneur’s freewheeling approach to speech could make the social media platform less safe for brands. But fears of a seismic shift in ad dollars are overblown, industry experts say.
“Major advertisers today are naturally worried about a Musk-Twitter world,” Carter Murray, investor and marketing expert and former global CEO of ad agency FCB, wrote in an email to Yahoo Finance.
According to advertisers, a guardrail-free Twitter could mean ads are shown adjacent to controversial content that brands would not want to be associated with, like racism, bigotry or sexism. A less moderated version of Twitter “would mean trying to reach out to their customers in a Twitter world littered with hate speech and vitriol which will cost them both money to make sure they avoid, and when they can’t it will have their brands damaged by association," said Murray.
Musk has long advocated for a freer version of speech on Twitter. The billionaire’s gripe with Twitter goes back to his fight with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over his infamous “funding secured” tweet, ultimately leading to a settlement in which Tesla lawyers would oversee Musk’s tweets. Musk has since claimed that the settlement was made under duress.
“Twitter has become the de facto town square,” Musk said in a TED Talk on April 14. “It’s really important that people have both the reality and the perception that they are able to speak freely within the bounds of the law.”
Twitter currently derives most of its revenue from advertising. In Q4 2021, the company reported advertising revenue of $1.41 billion out of $1.57 billion in total revenue during that quarter.
Musk has directly addressed advertising on the platform in several tweets, in one saying that Twitter under his leadership would have “no ads. More on https://finance.yahoo.com/finance/news/an-elon-musk-owned-twitter-could-be-bad-for-advertisers-211004465.html
Comments
Post a Comment